CFC reductions are often hailed as an environmental policy success story. The reason CFC reduction policies have been so successful is Congress taxed the bejesus out of CFCs.I find the subsequent news item about taxing overgrown lawns in Jupiter, Florida entertaining, but not very relevant. And unfortunately the "tax the bejesus" strategy isn't as viable for massive emittants (is that a word) like CO2, NOx and methane.The Clean Air Act (Title VI) established caps on most CFC's as agreed upon under the Montreal Protocol, with a complete phase out occurring around the year 2000. The tax on CFC's was $1.37 a pound in 1990 and 1991, about twice the then current product price. Recycled CFC's were exempted from the tax.The lesson: economic incentives change behavior.
The tax was raised in 1990 and again in 1992. The tax raised to $3.10 per pound in 1995 and to $4.90 per pound in 1996, raising the price six fold.
Showing posts with label CO2. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CO2. Show all posts
CFC reduction: a success story
Also via Tim Haab at Environmental Economics:
Labels:
air pollution,
carbon tax,
CFCs,
climate change,
CO2,
environmental regulation,
methane,
NOx,
ozone,
pollution,
taxes
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)