Showing posts with label data-driven management. Show all posts
Showing posts with label data-driven management. Show all posts

Management consulting sucks: Jill Lepore edition

Chris Blattman, a former management consultant himself, links to this New Yorker article on the origins of management consulting. Consulting is an easy target, and I (in a self-interested and biased way) think it gets a bad rap - for example, I don't think the lack of intellectual rigor insinuated by Stewart's "two-handed regressions" anecdote is a fair characterization of the best work that we consultants do. But some of the author's jabs are quite fair, and her profile of a handful of historical figures is fascinating.

Here's the obligatory takedown of modern work culture (better than most):
Home and work, separated since the first stirrings of the Industrial Revolution, have been growing back together again: BlackBerry on the nightstand, toaster in the photocopy room. Efficiency was meant to lead to a shorter workday, but, in the final two decades of the twentieth century, the average American added a hundred and sixty-four hours of work in the course of a year; that’s a whole extra month’s time, but not, typically, a month’s worth of either happiness minutes or civic participation. Eating dinner standing up while nursing a baby, making a phone call to the office, and supervising a third grader’s homework is not, I don’t think, the hope of democracy.
... and the witty but biting conclusion:
Lillian Gilbreth died, of a stroke, in Scottsdale, Arizona, in 1972, at the age of ninety-three. She was cremated. The Times ran an obituary headed “Dr. Gilbreth, Engineer, Mother of Dozen.” She had always believed that the world needed “a new philosophy of work.” She never did manage to write it.

The many legacies of Robert McNamara

Robert McNamara recently passed away. He's best known for being the Secretary of Defense who promoted a war of attrition in Vietnam. Tyler Cowen highlights how he shaped the World Bank into a modern technocracy. FP Passport remembers his advocacy of nuclear disarmament later in life.

In Ahead of the Curve, which I recently discussed, Philip Delves Broughton uses HBS grad McNamara as his closing example of the pitfalls of applying "modern business management" in other spheres:
The journalist David Halberstram wrote that McNamara mistrusted people who did not speak his language of statistics and hard data. If it ever came down to one person saying something "just didn't feel right" or that it "smelled wrong," McNamara would always go with his facts over their feeling. Fatally, in the case of Vietnam, the data he received were not accurate, and yet he trusted more in the illusion of reality generated by the faulty data - the clean, impersonal, objective facts - than in the messy yet accurate eyewitness reports brought home by journalists and soldiers.
Reflecting on McNamara should remind us that, for all its "scientific" appeal, data-driven management is eminently subject to the crap in, crap out principle.